Q: Why was MagicMock produced a separate detail rather then just folding the flexibility into the default mock object?

It absolutely was all carried out as 'pure' C++ code, utilizing the magic of templates. There was some do the job finished to compilers to Increase the STL (I'm contemplating several optimisations) but or else, no, you could potentially compose all the STL if you truly desired.

It may well appear to be a tad banal, but there IS a minimum of a person actual magic amount in each programming language. 0

In the gnuwin32 offer I have observed magic and magic.mgc. I put them to a similar folder, and got WindowsError: [Error 126] on libmagic = None # Let us try to find magic or magic1 dll = ctypes.

Next, MagicMock gives default implementations of many/most magic solutions, While Mock would not. See listed here For more info within the magic solutions presented.

Other packages can browse the very first couple of figures of the file and properly determine GIFs. The Threat is usually that random binary information can incorporate these exact same figures.

In the event the default SMTP port for that application is changed, then it would need to be current in many areas creating the opportunity of inconsistency.

In most of these illustrations the Mock and MagicMock lessons are interchangeable. Since the MagicMock is the more capable course it makes a wise a person to implement by default.

– mtvec Commented Aug 26, magic 2010 at 13:04 3 perfectly, Individuals usually are not in the current Model of the common. They are scheduled for inclusion in C++0x (and immediately skimming the draft didn't produce any info on how they may be executed, so you might be suitable that they call for compiler magic to carry out -- Conversely, their only goal then is to show this compiler magic so ordinary developers may perhaps use it. They do not continue to keep it to on their own like @Career's Java examples do.)

It really is niche then is Evidence of idea to get a method in a big company or conversion, importing, exporting for a improvement corporation. It is sweet for $25k applications that happen to be database heavy and never heading cellular.

When you are interested in Finding out this, you could download a "absolutely free" version in the software package that only is effective with sqlite databases known as UniPaaS Jet.

A: Just one fair solution is that the way MagicMock will work is that it preconfigures each one of these protocol approaches by building new Mocks and setting them, so if each and every new mock designed lots of new mocks and set Individuals as protocol approaches and afterwards all those protocol methods produced a bunch much more mocks and set them on their protocol strategies, you have infinite recursion...

Cătălin PitișCătălin Pitiș fourteen.3k22 gold badges4040 silver badges6363 bronze badges six But my dilemma is whether or not the implementation of your STL alone desires any "magic" with the compiler.

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it concentrates on just one challenge only by modifying this put up.